{"id":18457,"date":"2020-02-11T15:43:06","date_gmt":"2020-02-11T20:43:06","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.aidslaw.ca\/site\/?p=18457"},"modified":"2022-10-04T22:04:48","modified_gmt":"2022-10-05T02:04:48","slug":"statement-why-are-we-still-prosecuting-people-living-with-hiv-who-use-condoms","status":"publish","type":"news22","link":"https:\/\/www.hivlegalnetwork.ca\/site\/statement-why-are-we-still-prosecuting-people-living-with-hiv-who-use-condoms\/","title":{"rendered":"STATEMENT: WHY ARE WE STILL PROSECUTING PEOPLE LIVING WITH HIV WHO USE CONDOMS?"},"content":{"rendered":"<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><i>The following statement is issued jointly by the Canadian HIV\/AIDS Legal Network (\u201cLegal Network\u201d), the Coalition des organismes communautaires qu\u00e9b\u00e9cois de lutte contre le sida (COCQ-SIDA), and the HIV &amp; AIDS Legal Clinic Ontario (HALCO). Comments can be attributed to Richard Elliott, Executive Director, Canadian HIV\/AIDS Legal Network.<\/i><\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p><b>TORONTO, <\/b><b>February 12, 2020<\/b> \u2014 Today, the Canadian HIV\/AIDS Legal Network, COCQ-SIDA and HALCO are jointly intervening in \u201cR v NG,\u201d a precedent-setting case before the Court of Appeal for Ontario.<\/p>\n<p><span lang=\"EN-CA\">In this case, a young man living with HIV was convicted in 2017 of aggravated sexual assault for not disclosing his HIV-positive status before sexual intercourse \u2014 despite using a condom in every instance. There is no allegation that HIV was transmitted and no evidence of any incorrect condom use. <\/span><\/p>\n<p><span lang=\"EN-CA\">Evidence before the court indicated that when used correctly, condoms are 100% effective in preventing HIV transmission because the virus cannot pass through them. Despite this, the trial judge ruled that condom use alone was insufficient; therefore the non-disclosure of his HIV status was an <i>aggravated sexual assault<\/i>, one of Canada\u2019s most serious offences. <\/span><\/p>\n<p><span lang=\"EN-CA\">In our view, it is wrong to insist that <u>both<\/u> <i>a low viral load <\/i>(i.e. treatment that suppresses HIV in the body) <u>and<\/u> <i>condom use<\/i> are required in order to negate a \u201crealistic possibility of HIV transmission,\u201d which is the legal standard for a duty to disclose. <\/span><\/p>\n<p><b><span lang=\"EN-CA\">Today we are arguing in court that correct condom use is, and should be, sufficient to prevent criminal prosecution.<\/span><\/b><\/p>\n<p><span lang=\"EN-CA\">The consensus of scientific experts across Canada and around the world is that \u201ccorrect use of a condom during sex means HIV transmission is not possible.\u201d (See both the original <\/span><a href=\"..\/download\/16147\/\"><span lang=\"EN-CA\">consensus statement of Canadian scientists<\/span><\/a><span lang=\"EN-CA\"> and the more recent <\/span><a href=\"..\/download\/17066\/\"><span lang=\"EN-CA\">international Expert Consensus Statement<\/span><\/a><span lang=\"EN-CA\"> from scientists and leading international HIV scientific organizations.) <b>Continuing to criminalize people living with HIV who use condoms is discriminatory and an overly broad application of the criminal law that is harmful and bad for public health. <\/b><\/span><\/p>\n<p><span lang=\"EN-CA\">The trial judge\u2019s original decision was based on the 2012 Supreme Court of Canada decision in <i>R. v. Mabior<\/i>. That case has often been interpreted as saying that the law always requires both a low viral load and condom use in order to negate a realistic possibility of HIV transmission. However, the Supreme Court was not so categorical in its decision, and recognized that the law could adapt in future. <\/span><\/p>\n<p><span lang=\"EN-CA\">Since that decision eight years ago, there have been cases in which, based on the scientific evidence before them, courts have concluded that a low viral load on its own negates a realistic possibility of transmission. This recognizes the global consensus that a person with a suppressed viral load cannot sexually transmit HIV \u2014 in other words, \u201cUndetectable = Untransmittable\u201d. It\u2019s time for the law to catch up with the science and recognize that condoms can also negate a realistic possibility of transmission.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><b><span lang=\"EN-CA\">The injustice of criminalizing people living with HIV who correctly use condoms is compounded by the severe consequences of a conviction for <i>aggravated sexual assault<\/i>, including years in prison, mandatory lifetime designation as a sex offender and, in some cases, deportation.<\/span><\/b><span lang=\"EN-CA\"> <b>These are grossly disproportionate penalties for a sexual encounter that is otherwise consensual, and in which a person has taken a highly effective precaution that means either zero risk or at most a negligible risk of HIV transmission.<\/b><\/span><\/p>\n<p>As interveners in this hearing, the Legal Network, COCQ-SIDA and HALCO will advocate for a ruling that is based on science, respects human rights and is good public policy.<b> <\/b><\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p align=\"center\">-30-<\/p>\n<p><b>For more information:<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>\u00a0<\/b><\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/watch?v=BgxFQwX0NNA\">Watch our video<\/a> explaining the criminalization of people living with HIV in Canada.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>Emma Riach<\/p>\n<p>Communications and Campaigns Officer<\/p>\n<p>Canadian HIV\/AIDS Legal Network<\/p>\n<p>416-595-1666 x 236<\/p>\n<p>437-985-6544<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"mailto:eriach@aidslaw.ca\">eriach@aidslaw.ca<\/a>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>The following statement is issued jointly by the Canadian HIV\/AIDS Legal Network (\u201cLegal Network\u201d), the Coalition des organismes communautaires qu\u00e9b\u00e9cois de lutte contre le sida (COCQ-SIDA), and the HIV &amp; AIDS Legal Clinic Ontario (HALCO). Comments can be attributed to Richard Elliott, Executive Director, Canadian HIV\/AIDS Legal Network. &nbsp; TORONTO, February 12, 2020 \u2014 Today, &#8230; <a title=\"STATEMENT: WHY ARE WE STILL PROSECUTING PEOPLE LIVING WITH HIV WHO USE CONDOMS?\" class=\"read-more\" href=\"https:\/\/www.hivlegalnetwork.ca\/site\/statement-why-are-we-still-prosecuting-people-living-with-hiv-who-use-condoms\/\" aria-label=\"More on STATEMENT: WHY ARE WE STILL PROSECUTING PEOPLE LIVING WITH HIV WHO USE CONDOMS?\">Read more<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"menu_order":0,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"publication_topics":[148],"publication_language":[184,185],"class_list":["post-18457","news22","type-news22","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","publication_topics-criminalization","publication_language-english","publication_language-french"],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.hivlegalnetwork.ca\/site\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/news22\/18457","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.hivlegalnetwork.ca\/site\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/news22"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.hivlegalnetwork.ca\/site\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/news22"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.hivlegalnetwork.ca\/site\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"version-history":[{"count":5,"href":"https:\/\/www.hivlegalnetwork.ca\/site\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/news22\/18457\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":22557,"href":"https:\/\/www.hivlegalnetwork.ca\/site\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/news22\/18457\/revisions\/22557"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.hivlegalnetwork.ca\/site\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=18457"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"publication_topics","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.hivlegalnetwork.ca\/site\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/publication_topics?post=18457"},{"taxonomy":"publication_language","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.hivlegalnetwork.ca\/site\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/publication_language?post=18457"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}