This statement can be attributed to the Canadian Drug Policy Coalition, the Drug Strategy Network
of Ontario, and the HIV Legal Network.
November 27, 2024 — Toronto, ON | We are watching with grave concern as the Government of
Ontario attempts to force through radical legislation that will eliminate life-saving supervised
consumption services (SCS) and prevent access to other evidence-based responses to an
unregulated drug crisis that is killing 10 people in Ontario every single day.
We appeal to the government to withdraw their time allocation motion. Experts in the care for
people with substance use disorder and other people who use drugs are anxious for the
opportunity to speak to Committee about this bill and the devastating effects it will have on
Ontarians. The opportunity for such expertise to inform the contents of this Bill is an opportunity
afforded by our parliamentary democracy for good reason. It ensures that our laws are informed by
evidence and lived experience.
“The government’s attempt on Tuesday to force this devastating bill through the legislature —
without debate or committee study — sent a very clear messages to all people in this
province: democratic process doesn’t matter, evidence doesn’t matter, and the workload of
health, medical, social service and first response workers doesn’t matter,” says Michael
Parkinson of the Drug Strategy Network of Ontario. “Most frighteningly, the government is saying
that people’s lives in Ontario do not matter.”
The Premier and Health Minister are well aware of the appalling consequences that will follow if
these vital health services are prohibited. “The government has been warned by their own
internal counsel of the devastation expected to occur in communities across Ontario,
particularly among Black, Indigenous, and low-income people,” says Beeta Senedjani of the
Canadian Drug Policy Coalition. “This bill would legislate an increase in deaths of our loved
ones, public drug use in our neighbourhoods, and healthcare costs that will affect all
taxpayers.” In bypassing debate and committee review, the Ontario government would silence
elected representatives, community members, and public health and scientific experts who would
have provided the evidence that SCS are, unequivocally, in the public interest.
According to both internal government advice and independent evaluations, it is widely expected
that this proposed law will:
• Kill, injure, or otherwise harm people in Ontario by removing their access to life-saving harm
reduction services in the event of an overdose emergency;
• Increase drug use in public places such as parks and school yards;
• Increase the chances of people, including children, witnessing overdose emergencies;
• Increase the amount of discarded drug use equipment in public spaces;
• Increase the workload for already overburdened first responders, hospital emergency
rooms, and other frontline staff;
• Reduce ambulance availability for all members of the public; and
• Increase costs to taxpayers.
There is near-unanimous consensus about the negative impacts these impending closures will
have, of which the Government of Ontario is aware and is willfully choosing to ignore. Ample
studies, including internal government reports and independent evaluations, consistently
demonstrate the public health and safety benefits of SCS. Ontario’s supervised consumption
services have recorded 1.12 million visits from 178,000 unique clients since March 2020, according
to a recent report, and have successfully reversed 22,000 overdoses and facilitated more than
530,000 service referrals to housing, case management, substance use treatment, and more.
Additionally, data from Toronto demonstrate that neighbourhoods with supervised consumption
services subsequently experienced 67 per cent reductions in overdose mortality, while other
neighbourhoods showed no significant decreases. These services are desperately needed.
SCS also reduce public drug use and discarded drug use equipment. Contrary to the Ontario
government’s claims that crime has increased in neighbourhoods with SCS relative to other
neighbourhoods, a recent study found decreases in rates of homicide, assault, and robbery in the
vicinity of an SCS after opening.
If passed as drafted, Ontario would soon see the dire impact of government officials determining
health policy based on opinions, ideology, and political calculations instead of public interest.
“Our loved ones will die. Our communities will suffer. The Government of Ontario knows this,
and is proceeding with reckless abandon,” says Sandra Ka Hon Chu of HIV Legal Network. “Our
organizations — and many others across the province, country, and globally — will continue to
advocate for SCS to remain open.”
-30-
Media Contacts:
Beeta Senedjani, Canadian Drug Policy Coalition
beeta_senedjani@sfu.ca
Sandra Ka Hon Chu, HIV Legal Network
schu@hivlegalnetwork.ca
Michael Parkinson, Drug Strategy Network of Ontario
ontariodrugstrategies@gmail.com
For more information about SCS and the current state of the law in Canada, see this recent report
from the HIV Legal Network.